HWQ

one of the most interesting words found in the old testament in terms of relationships is the word HWQ (pronounced kah-wah,) and is found in the book of ecclesiastes.  the literal meaning of the word is three-stranded cord, and the actual verse says “a three-stranded cord is not easily broken.”  the verse itself is referring to a relationship with another person, and is many times used to refer to a marital relationship. 

the physics behind this concept is simple.  when two cords are twisted together to make a bigger cord, an interesting thing happens when a load is placed upon it.  the two cords start to come untwisted, and each strand will bear the full weight of that load individually, thereby weakening the total weight capacity of the cord.  however, when three strands are braided together to make a cord, when a load is placed upon that cord, each of the strands pulls closer to each other, and essentially forms one cord and the weight of that load is distributed throughout the total cord, making it much harder to break.  

the three strands of the cord represent the two people involved in the relationship, with God as the third strand.  this upcoming anniversary will be the first one i have missed in our 13 years of marriage.  until now, all of my deployments, trainings, and times away with the navy, have all been timed to where i have been able to be home in time for my anniversary.  during this time away, i have been thinking a lot about the past. for those of you that haven’t known us that long (we have an over 20 year history together,) we have a very unique story that goes all the way back to 9^th grade.  

i met my bride when she moved to clarksdale from chicago in the 9^th grade.  i was blown away by this blue-eyed, long-haired beauty that thought it was appropriate to wear shorts in 50 degree weather, and went home and told my mom that i had met the most beautiful girl i had ever seen!  i chased her for a while, content to be friends with her for the time being, and a strong friendship developed.  i have always argued that guys are friends with girls for one of two reasons:  because they like them and are hoping for a chance, or because they are truly friends and are content with things staying that way.  truthfully, this relationship was both.  i was content to have her as my best friend, but was more than happy to entertain any romantic feelings she might have had toward me.  we were inseparable.  where you found one of us, the other was usually close by, and we were happy.  however, a kiss on a choir tour bus (which we refer to as the “accident”) changed all of that, and we started dating.  this went on for a year, until a significant change happened.  i was a professing CHRISTian at the time, and she was also.  but when CHRIST actually spoke to her and she actually accepted Him as Saviour, things between us began to change a bit.  my focus was on the relationship, hers began to be on CHRIST.  i had raised her to the position of a functional god, and had even started saving up money for an engagement ring (without telling my parents because i didn’t want to hear a lecture, even though it would have been right!)   

realizing my overly important focus on the relationship, she started pulling away, and eventually broke up with me.  at the time i was devastated, and had a very rough year following the break-up.  however, God in His providence used that time to show me that i was indeed lost, and had a form of religion, but did not have CHRIST.  and CHRIST called me to repentance, and i repented and accepted Him as Saviour and things began to change for me.  

well, long story short, God would end up bringing my bride and i back together after different colleges, different states, and seven years apart, and this time, it was different.  we both agreed that CHRIST should be the center of our relationship, and it has made all the difference.  if we would have gotten married all those years ago, we probably would have ended up divorced after a year or two.  but now, we have something that is truly unique and special, and have come through quite a bit as a married couple.  the vows that couples say during a wedding, have been an accurate description of our marriage.  we’ve had better times, and worse times, times so bad that it seemed as if we weren’t going to make it.  we’ve had health, but also plenty of sickness (we've gotten way more than our money's worth out of our health insurance!)  we’ve been financially stable, and have been poor enough that we had to suck up pride and move back in with parents due to unemployment or under employment.  there have been plenty of opportunities to cheat without getting caught, as deployments can bring, and many service members succumb to that temptation and end up in my office.  the thing that has made all the difference though, is having CHRIST at the center of our relationship, and honoring our commitment not only to each other, but to Him as well.  and part of having CHRIST, is the family that you are born into when you accept Him.  there have been times where our families, both biological and spiritual, have stepped in to counsel us during times of difficulty, which has been an invaluable resource that CHRIST has used.  it hasn’t been easy, but our three-stranded cord, our HWQ, has not broken.  that is not to say it can’t be broken, because to do so would be arrogant, and love does not boast in itself.  

in that cord, if one of the strands decides to go it on their own, and starts pulling away, they begin to bear the brunt of the load on their own, and they will break before the other two, leaving a weakened cord to carry the load.  it is a sad thing to see.  one of the greatest lies that I have ever heard in marriage counseling, is that they felt like God was telling them that they deserved to be happy and that they needed to get out of their marriage because they weren’t happy.  mind you, these were not cases of abuse or neglect, but simply because life’s strain had taken a toll on their marriage and that person decided that they could better do it on their own.  sometimes, it was both parties pulling away from CHRIST, and no matter how much they tried to save the marriage, they would break.  so remember, during those times of difficulty, instead of pulling away from your spouse, or pulling away from CHRIST, choose instead to seek His face, and to cling tighter to your spouse, and the three of you together can remain strong in the midst of life’s strain.

real love

on this day, 13 years ago, i traveled to clarksdale, ms, to begin the preparations to marry my bride.  so in the coming days, expect a few more blog posts as i brag on my bride and our relationship.  as mentioned in my last post, marriages nowadays seem to be going to the wayside, with most of them ending before the seven year mark.  the divorce rate is dropping, yes, but a significant reason for that is many couples are choosing not to get married and simply live together, so the ending of those relationships is not figured in the divorce statistic, otherwise it would be much higher.  so 13 years of marital bliss, or something like it, is something that i am proud of.  however, it is only because of CHRIST that we are where we are today, so i give Him the credit for modeling to us what true love is.  and that's what we strive for.  my post is not meant to put us up on a pedestal as the end all, be all example of a perfect marriage.  yes, our marriage is perfect, in its imperfections.  we get angry at each other.  there are times we don't talk to each other, or conversely we raise our voice at each other.  we can be selfish.  we can be arrogant (after all, i'm always right, right baby love?)  i am stubborn and she is persistent (notice i didn't say nagging!)  i am passive-aggressive and she is blunt and confrontational.  we are an example of opposites attracting, but sometimes opposites attacking.  however, we have love, and it is a love that requires work, as any good thing does.

there are many things in life that bring people joy.  some find joy in simple things, such as a sunset, a day at the beach, or a bouquet of fresh cut daisies.  others find joy in more tangible things, things like money, a car, a house.  still others search for joy in a job, a hometown, or travelling.  and some find their joy in a combination of any of the above things.  but there is no greater joy in this life than to find love.  love can take on many forms, and love is a complicated word.  it is so complicated that the greeks had three different words for love:  eros, phileo, and agape. 

the first word, eros, is a physical love.  it is where we get our word erotic.  it is the love that teenagers say they feel when they get the butterflies in their stomachs and their heart races when they see a certain boy or a girl.  it is the love that is responsible for lost virginity, for broken hearts, and for strings of failed dating relationships.  it is a very powerful emotion, releasing endorphins, the “feel good” chemicals in our brains, which creates a sort of addiction, which is why we never get over our first love.  that initial feeling creates such a mark in our memories, that we spend the rest of our lives chasing that feeling, much like a drug addict chasing that first high.  but we should never dismiss eros as simplistic and shallow, for it is a gateway emotion, that when paired with the other two creates something so magical it could only have been created by the Creator. 

the second word, phileo, is love based on a bond.  it is the love felt between friends and family members.  it literally means “brotherly love,” which is where we get the name of our city philadelphia, meaning the “city of brotherly love.”  it is this love that goes beyond mere physical attraction.  on the love scale, it is the mid-level love.  it’s a love that isn’t based on simple emotions or feelings, but rather is one that goes deeper and is more complex.  unlike eros, phileo is a love that is not easily lost.  this is why old friends can spend years and even decades apart, and then when they get back together again pick up like they never were apart.  it’s why brothers and sisters, no matter how far apart they are, will relish every chance they have to spend together, no matter how much that sibling may have been annoying or even infuriating in the past.  like said before, it is not easily lost, but yet it can be lost.  there are stories of brothers going lifetimes without talking over a fight.  there are children who seek to “divorce” their parents.  best friends can quickly become enemies under the right circumstances.  even husbands and wives who genuinely have this kind of love based on the bond of matrimony, can eventually grow apart or have a big enough fight that they walk away from the relationship.  one redeeming factor of phileo is that it is a love that can be restored, but only if the third type of love is present. 

the third type of love is agape, meaning unconditional love.  the first two loves have conditions to them.  they are based on feelings and emotions, and those can be very fickle.  emotions are very powerful, and can cause us to make decisions many times without thinking about them.  or they are based on bonds, bonds that can be broken, thereby making that love no longer valid.  agape is not like this.  it is not based on emotions or bonds.  it is based on a conscious decision to love someone and to be committed to that person regardless of how they act, what they look like, or how they treat you.  it is a perfect love, one that is held by the Creator of love towards all of humankind.  it is best shown in romans 5:8 which says that God has shown us His love by CHRIST dying for us, even though we were sinners.  it is the love you are to use when commanded to love your enemies.  it is the only love that can allow you to truly forgive someone for a wrong committed against you.  moreover, it is that love that allows full reconciliation after forgiveness.  this love is consistently found in those marriages that last for 30 years or more. 

the beatles once said, “all you need is love,” and there is truth in that, but it is the right combination of the three kinds of love.  but to truly have a love that brings lasting joy, a combination of the three is necessary.  you can have agape, and a relationship can last, but one or both people can be completely miserable.  that is not the love that we are meant to experience.  love is meant to bring joy, and when you look at the characteristics of love in 1 corinthians 13, they are made up of a combination of all three.  when all three are present, there is a fulfillment like no other.  the temptation to look elsewhere is diminished, and each person learns to not only be content with their lover, but with themselves as well.  true love builds up everyone involved.

our story is one that would not have happened had the right combination of those three expressions of love not been present.  it is the story of two young people, from completely different backgrounds, who discovered each other, and the joy that could be had through a shared love, and as a result, they discovered themselves.  it is a story of happiness and heartbreak, joy and bitterness, hope and despair, hurt and forgiveness, loss and triumph.  the details are not always pretty, but the finished work is a beautiful masterpiece. it is a story of love.   
 

throw-away marriage

my bride and i are celebrating 13 years of marriage bliss (or something like it) in less than three weeks.  being an avid student of all things i find important, i've been delving through some marriage books such as "the five love languages (military edition)" and "real marriage."  three deployments in three years has definitely taken its toll on our family and our marriage, and thanks to the grace and honesty of my amazingly supportive bride, there were some things that i needed to work on that i was completely unaware i had begun developing, such as detachment and other emotional defenses.  so i've been trying to take advantage of this time apart to attempt to come back a better husband and father than i was when i left.  and it doesn't matter who you are, if you aren't growing in something, you are decaying.  it's the cause and effect nature of life. 

(note: i use "Church" in this post referring to the holy Church as a body, which was instituted by CHRIST, and "church" in reference to the business organization that fills so many buildings with crosses on them today.)

in pondering the topic of marriage, i began to think about marriage in general and all of the debate surrounding marriage today.  it's interesting that only 20 or 30 years ago, the church was all about how divorce was evil, and the availability of no fault divorces would destroy the family.  however, when attempts at legislating divorce failed, the church gave up and moved onto a different social target, which was abortion at the time.  so what happened?  did we lose sight of divorce and the detriment and heartbreak it can cause, or did we simply concede defeat and attack a different front? 

i also shake my head at the hypocrisy of the church today to condemn same-sex marriage when we readily accept divorce, and become the embodiment of the proverbial speck and log parable told by Jesus.  i'm not saying same-sex marriage is biblical, because it is by no means that, but it's no wonder society looks at us as a church and says, "why should we listen to your teachings on marriage when you don't even obey them yourselves?"

i say that as multiple marriages i know currently are on the verge of ending in divorce. moreover, as a counselor, a large majority of my cases are marriages that are ending or in trouble.  divorce is nothing new.  it was referenced even in old testament times.  there are varying beliefs on divorce within the Church, with some allowing for divorce in cases of abandonment or adultery, and others going so far as to say divorce is never allowed.  i fall under the former, even though it is still not the ideal.  if marriage is supposed to be the picture of CHRIST's relationship to His Church, then where would we be if He took that stance?  i believe that all marriages can be saved if the two people are committed to each other, and i counsel to that effect.  don't get me wrong, there are situations where i believe separation is necessary, and even divorce, such as in cases of abuse and neglect, but again, it was not the ideal that God set up from the beginning.  there is a reason divorce is so detrimental to CHRISTians (i say that because governmental marriage does not equate to biblical marriage.)  the Bible states that when two people are joined in holy marriage before God, they are one flesh.  so a divorce is essentially splitting one person into two separate halves, which is majorly traumatic.

but today, society has bought into a few major lies:  everything is disposable, people deserve to be happy, and there is room for a standard of beauty among CHRISTians.  these three lies have led to the destruction of most of the marriages that i have watched crumble as lives were destroyed.

the first lie is that everything is disposable.  in talking with a chief on one of my ships, he said that his grandparents had been married for 60 years, and his "pawpaw" attributed that to the mentality of society when they got married.  he said, "back then, when something broke, you didn't run to the store and buy another one, you fixed it.  so we took that approach with marriage."  there's some truth to that.  we live in a throw-away, instant gratification society.  so when a marriage isn't working, we throw it to the trash and go find another one.  when our spouse isn't satisfying us, we throw them to the side go find someone who will.  i went to a wedding some years back, and in the vows, they removed "till death do us part," and replaced it with "as long as love shall last."  well, the problem with that mentality lies in how they define love.  this is because society's definition of love is severely flawed, and i see that played out everyday when couples sit in my office and say, "we just fell out of love," as if love is some sort of wagon that you're riding in and then just slip and fall out.  love is no longer seen as commitment and unconditional.  it is an emotion, based on those romantic or sexual feelings that we have in the beginning.  when those fade, rather than saying "what happened and how do we fix it?" we say "well, this one is broken.  time to go get another one."  it sets up a vicious cycle if left unchecked, because once that broken marriage is replaced with a shiny new one that is full of that excitement and romance, it eventually will suffer the same fate. 

the second lie is that people deserve to be happy.  this is a direct product of the self-esteem movement of the 1980s, which led to the "me-generation" where everyone is focused on self.  when someone tells me that they deserve to be happy, i immediately ask them why.  the stammering and the digging for reasons is indicative of the true reality, which is that none of us deserve to be happy.  we are all liars, cheaters, thieves, adulterers, idolaters, murderers (yes, if we harbor hate in our heart CHRIST says it is the same as murder), and breakers of God's law.  that means that we deserve death, judgment, and hell.  now, we don't like to hear that because we like to think that we are inherently good.  don't believe it?  ask somebody if they're good, and they'll say yes, but if you point out their flaws, they begin to list all the things that they didn't do, and compare themselves to others whom they see as "worse" than them.  it's human nature, based off of pride.  the problem is, if we break one part of the law, we are guilty of the whole of the law.  that means that we are as just as guilty before God as the murderer on death row, the rapist serving life, the homosexual engaging in sex with their partner, or the roman centurion pounding nails into a perfect Saviour.  but we buy into the lie that we are good, ignoring Scripture which says our righteousness is like bloody menstrual rags, and therefore we deserve certain things, including happiness.  so when our marriage partner ends up not making us happy anymore because they don't pick up after themselves, they spend too much money or hoard too much money, they pick their teeth, they gained or lost weight, they want too much sex or not enough sex, or any of the other flaws that we can point out that bring us down, we bail.  we gravitate towards that person or thing or lifestyle that meets our standard of happiness.  we run to that greener grass, not taking into account that it's probably growing on top of a septic system.

the third lie we buy is that there is a standard of beauty among CHRISTians.  i am not just referencing physical beauty, either.  society has gotten us to believe that beauty lies in measurements, facial features, personality, attraction, or any other standard we can set up.  so when our spouse no longer has the six pack abs or the perfect breasts or the brown hair (or hair at all) then we have the right to no longer be attracted to that person.  when our spouse, who used to be an extrovert and the life of the party, now would rather stay home and spend time with their family, we get to go and find someone else who is.  and many times i see it where people marry based upon their pre-conceived ideas of what a beautiful marriage is, and when it doesn't meet that standard of beauty, we feel gipped, and want a refund.  but the fact is that God only has one standard of beauty, and that is CHRIST.  and all of us fall desperately short of that standard, so we rely on His grace in applying that standard of beauty to us, so that when God sees us, He only sees the beauty of His Son.  and then we apply that to our spouse so that when i see my spouse, i see not just a smoking hot woman that needs kissing, (hey, it's true!) but i see her as a child of the King, a princess of God, a sister in Christ (don't think on that one too long because it gets to be a little creepy), and i see her as God sees her:  holy, blameless, and beyond reproach. 

i'll be honest here, when my bride and i got married, things were great.  we were living off of love, and didn't have much money, but that was okay.  however, as kids came along and the stresses of life began to bear down on us, that initial marital bliss that we enjoyed faded.  there were years in our marriage where it was difficult, and i know she would admit it as well.  thankfully, we both came into this marriage with the commitment to love each other, whether we liked each other at the time or not, and we have made it through some very difficult times.  we will probably have more difficult times in the future, and i know you find it hard to believe, but we don't always get along or agree on everything.  she still severely dislikes my music and her frumpy nightgowns aren't my favorite, but we make it work.  she knows that i am here for the long haul, and i know she isn't going anywhere. 

so what was the purpose of this post?  it's simply to step back and look at your marriage and thank God for your spouse.  ask yourself how do you live out your definition of love for your spouse?  are you making the choice to love them despite their flaws?  are they perfect despite their imperfections?  or is your love fickle, and you find yourself longing for greener pastures?  if that is you, then you have the wrong definition of love.  you have turned your back on your faith and essentially said that God made a mistake when He put the two of you together.  remember, God doesn't make mistakes, and when He brings two people together and accepts their vows as they make them to each other and to Him, he expects you to live out those vows.  and the wonderful thing about CHRIST is that He does forgive us when we do mess up.  even when a person has gone through divorce, He still forgives, even though the earthly consequences are still there.  but if a person is making plans to leave their spouse without prayerful consideration (and don't say that you have prayed and God has told you to leave your spouse, because that would make God a liar in His Word and inconsistent with His nature) then they are ignoring Scripture when paul said, "what shall we say then?  should we continue to sin so that we can get more grace?  GOD FORBID!"

i know that this is a touchy and difficult post, and each person has their own unique situation.  i have said before, and i will say it again, if a person is in an abusive relationship, then the marriage vows have been abandoned and the person needs to get to safety.  but Scripture is clear on marriage and divorce, and even if the church has conceded defeat in the divorce battle, it does not mean that i will.  otherwise i need to rip this cross off of my collar and go find another occupation.

finally, the church has made great strides in recent years in caring for divorced people and helping them and their children work through the trauma that it causes.  they have gone from condemnation to compassion, but must be careful to not delve over into condoning.  as the societal debates rage on, may the Church continue to reach out with compassion to our fellow sinners out there and show them the better way that CHRIST provides through His blood and redemption.  i used to say, "there but for the grace of God go i," but the truth is, i am just as guilty and "there i go, but because of the grace of God the price has been paid."  may it be said of all of us.

this might sting a little

wow.  it has been a while since i posted on here.  and looking at my other friends' blogs, it seems that i'm not the only one.  it's not that i haven't had anything to say, it's just that i've been busy, as life seems to always get in the way of extra-curricular activities such as rambling on a blog just in case someone is listening.  after all, that's all we are doing when we blog, talking into the air, just in case someone is interested.  think of us as the street preachers on the corner with a box and a microphone. 

so what has caused me to turn my microphone back on and step back up on my box with my "the end is near" sandwich board you ask?  since you are reading this, you know i am about to tell you.  one of the aspects of being in the military, is that it forces you to pay attention to world events.  i was recently in britain, and i realized how much we see things through american eyes.  while there, i saw various monuments referencing the "civil war," which confused me at first as i was wondering why the british would have monuments honoring a war overseas.  then it hit me, it wasn't our civil war, but theirs, aka the "war of the roses."  you would think i would learn, but then i saw another monument for world war 2, with the dates 1939-1945, i thought "1939?  world war 2 didn't start until...oh yeah!"  that being said, too often, we in america tend to focus on america, and neglect to remember that there is a big world outside of the united states.

a few months ago, in libya, a group of isis terrorists systematically beheaded a group of egyptian CHRISTians for no other reason than they were CHRISTian.  a few of them sang hymns, and a few prayed, as they were beheaded on that shoreline.  in syria and iraq, isis is killing CHRISTians by the hundreds, and destroying churches and sacred CHRISTian relics, leading to what some have called the "CHRISTian holocaust."  why do i bring this up?  because in the u.s., we've seem to become oblivious to this fact and are so comfortable in our own pews that we have become arrogant and complacent in our faith.

what do i mean?  ever since the 1950's and the post world war 2 moral revival (i say that, because it was then that the greatest shift in church attendance occurred, and many people became moralistic deists, mistaking it for CHRISTianity) our nation has enjoyed a peaceful time for the church.  however, in recent years, with the advent of political changes such as the legalization of homosexual marriage, religious pluralism, and islamic catering, a number of professing CHRISTians are crying "foul."  some have even gone so far as to use the "persecution" word. 

the problem is, that we have become so entrenched in our pseudo-CHRISTian moralistic lifestyles that we are shocked and appalled when we face any sort of opposition, and in our arrogance dare to put ourselves on the same levels as those who are paying the ultimate price for their faith right now.  we've become no better than those on the left who are equating being denied a cake to the holocaust.  how did we get here?  what led to that arrogance?

ever since the phenomenon known as the "moral majority" took place, CHRISTians, or those who profess to be, have enjoyed living our lives in relative comfort, thanks to laws put in place to keep us that way.  in doing so, we gloss over those passages in Scripture that tell us to expect opposition.  they become a catch phrase, or something that happens in far off lands.  sure, we reference those who have lost their lives in church on sunday morning, and we pray for those who are suffering, but we truly are removed from any such suffering ourselves and are hard-pressed to understand what it is really like.  so when the laws that we've enjoyed for so long start to change, and we are forced to pull our heads out of the sand and look around, we don't like what we see.  so what do we do?  we attempt to frantically grasp for more sand to pile around us so that we can rebury our head.

we do this, because we like to be comfortable.  we would rather continue to legislate morality and hope that it fixes the problem so that we don't have to deal with it.  sure CHRIST loves those evil sinners outside of our circle of church wagons, and we'll pray for them, but we'd rather they just behave and stay in their little boxes and leave us be.  we've tried it for years with divorce laws, "merry CHRISTmas" laws, heterosexual marriage laws, anti-abortion laws, prohibition laws, and any other moralistic pseudo-CHRISTian law we can find to keep our world neat and tidy.  these laws have failed time and time again.  sure, they fix the problem on the surface, but bootleggers still made moonshine despite prohibition, people still got back-alley abortions, people still had homosexual sex, etc.  we were trying to put a band-aid on a bullet hole, give the patient a pat on the head, and then say, "go 'way kid, ya bother me!" 

as i've spent time studying the Scriptures in my daily life, it has occurred to me that nowhere does it say we are to initiate change on a societal level.  Jesus told us that we will be hated for His name's sake.  He said to render unto caesar that which is caesar's, thereby affirming the oppressive roman government that was in place.  He refused to be the militant Messiah that the people were hoping for to overthrow the roman government, and when He didn't, they turned on Him and had Him killed for it.  Jesus even went so far to say that if you were struck on the cheek, to turn your other cheek to let them slap you on that one as well, and that if you were asked to carry a man's cloak for one mile, referring to the roman practice of a soldier grabbing a jew and forcing them to carry their gear for up to a mile, that you were to carry it for three miles.  that message would be received today about as well as it was then.  paul went so far as to say to be subject to the laws and authorities that were placed over you, and that they received their authority from God. 

where does that leave us?  and that's the rub that no one wants to admit.  our practice of enacting laws to keep sin out of the culture is not only not sanctioned by Scripture, but is actually antithetical to it!  we are told that all of the things that are happening are going to happen, so we should not be surprised.  but we are not told to change society as a whole, but to preach the gospel and make disciples.  you see, societal change does not happen on the whole, but with individuals.  and that means you actually have to leave the safety of the country church club and go out and not just tell the gospel, but live it!  that means loving people despite their sin.  don't get me wrong, nowhere are we commanded to ignore people's sin, but to love them despite it and call them to repentance and faith in CHRIST.  when Jesus encountered sinners such as the woman at the well, the woman caught in adultery, and the rich young ruler, He directly addressed their sin along with calling them to follow Him.  we know that the rich young ruler left sadly, because his money had become his idol, but tradition tells us that the other two left their sin and followed Him. 

this business of isolating ourselves from the world has resulted in the world's writing off our CHRIST and those who claim to be His followers.  our critical disdain of people's sin has caused us to be labeled as bigots.  and part of it is our fault.  we have been setting our sights on sin targets for decades and then fired every moral weapon we have at them like heat seeking missiles, and countless souls have become the casualties of those attacks.  here's the thing, we haven't been called to change people's behavior or to rid them of their sins.  only CHRIST can do that.  we are only called to point them to the One who can set them free from the bondage of sin that has enslaved their lives, many of them blind to the chains that they wear.  only CHRIST can open their eyes to see them and only He can remove them.  but our actions have so masked CHRIST from them that all they can see are white-washed tombs full of dead men's bones.

so what does that mean?  are moralistic laws bad?  it depends on the intent behind them.  laws to protect the innocent babies that are slaughtered every year through abortion are needed, and we are ethically required to speak up for those who don't have a voice.  however, to use the name of CHRIST to force people to behave is not only unbiblical, it is harmful to the gospel.  when people are forced to do something, it is not love, it is slavery, and the last thing people need is another master controlling them.  that's what CHRIST came for, to set us free from all forms of slavery, and to take His yoke upon us, which is easier and lighter than the ones we force on ourselves and others.

just because a government enacts a law, does it change the reality of the Bible?  if a government calls something a marriage, does it redefine what the Bible has sanctioned as a marriage?  (here's one to chew on, does the government have to be involved in Biblical, covenental marriage before God for it to be valid in the eyes of God?  find that one in Scripture!)  if the government enacted a law tomorrow that said there was to be no one god recognized, does it change who the real God is?

the point is, we need to stop expecting our world around us to conform to our Biblical worldview, and expect what CHRIST promised us, that we are strangers in a strange lands, aliens in a foreign country.  we need to realize that in terms of persecution, we are not exempt from it, and ours by comparison to our fellow brothers and sisters in CHRIST pales when you take into account the price being paid only a plane ride away.  we also need to decide which hills we are going to die on.  we need to reevaluate our convictions and how we live them out and ask if those convictions are actually in line with CHRIST and His teachings to love others unconditionally, including those who are enemies, and decide what loving them actually means.  if you can reconcile that conviction in light of the call of CHRIST, then you must be willing to pay that price, be it fines, imprisonment, or worse.  one day, and i believe it will come and have been saying it for years, we will be asked to pay a far greater price for CHRIST than mere media attacks.  the question then becomes, how will you fare when real persecution comes to your doorstep and you are no longer able to legislate it away?  for now, enjoy the protections that our government provides, but for the sake of the gospel stop trying to control your little slice of heaven by hiding from and building walls to protect you from the world.  the world needs the message you bring, and trying to launch it from behind the walls on spiritual trebuchets is not working.  love God, love people.  you can't claim one and not the other.  my life verse is Romans 5:8, which states, "but God has shown us His love by Christ dying for us, even though we were miserable, wretched, hell-bound sinners, the very enemies of God" (paraphrased by me!)  how do you love people?  by risking your reputation, your safety, your financial stability, your life, to go to them in their sin and tell them that Jesus loves them and that you love them, and introduce them to the Saviour who set you free from your sins, which were many (and just as bad as whatever sin they happen to be engaging in!)  because make no mistake, one day our meek and gentle Saviour will return not on a donkey, but on a white horse, with a double-edged sword, and those who are not covered by the blood of CHRIST, be they those we call sinners or those moralistic deists we mistakenly label as CHRISTians in the pew next to us, will be judged by Him.  He is the only One qualified to judge the lost.  we will then have to answer for what we have done with the gospel.  will we say "i was scared of what the world would do to it, so i hid it?"  or will He say to us, "well done My good and faithful servant"?
-C.   

the day i saw the Saviour

i have been a CHRISTian since 1997, when CHRIST revealed Himself to me in fullness in el naranjal, honduras, on a dirt road in that mountain village.  no sermon, no invitation complete with 15 verses of "just as i am," just an almost pauline experience of "why are you playing games with religion?" with the Saviour.  i was raised by wonderful, godly parents, who made sure that i was exposed to the Bible and the Gospel throughout my childhood days, but i will be the first to admit that in my life i have had doubts, culminating in college when everything i was being forced to learn in the biology/chemistry field contradicted what i was taught as a child.  i went through a crisis of faith, that i mostly kept to myself, where i questioned all that i had been brought up to believe.  but once CHRIST saved me, and changed my life forever, my faith became solidified in my life.  however, i will admit that i felt as many CHRISTians probably feel, a longing for the day when our faith will become sight, and we can see the Saviour face to face.  what is the reason for this?  many will give you a plethora of reasons, but very few will admit that they themselves struggle with the reality of it.  sure, they may have faith, and the Bible defines faith as "the evidence of things unseen," and unfortunately, for the majority of CHRISTians around the world, their faith must needs be placed upon things unseen.  that does not make it any less real, nor does it imply ignorance on their part, but rather the reality that we have to believe something we can only read about, and as a result, we become almost like thomas:  wanting to believe, but finding it difficult sometimes in the midst of a lack of seeing it ourselves.  that is why we long for that day when we shall stand face to face before our Saviour, experiencing Him fully and bowing at His feet in humble thanks and adoration and worship.

however, yesterday, something changed.  i saw the Saviour.  when orthodox jews pray, they pray moving their whole body, utilizing all of their senses, yielding all of them to God.  until yesterday, the only sense utilized in my faith was the sense of hearing, when my faith came by hearing the Word of God.  however, being able to utilize the senses of sight, smell, and touch, brought me one step closer to faith becoming sight.  being able to walk in the steps that CHRIST walked; touching the place where He cried out in anguish for the cup to pass from him, where His cross was placed, where His body was laid in preparation for burial, and the stone slab in the tomb where He defeated death; smelling the smells of jerusalem, the musty smell of the olive trees and dirt in the garden of gethsemane, of the anointing oils used in burial that emanated from the stone of preparation, the sickly sweet smell of stone and earth inside the tomb; made everything in the Bible come alive.

but the one sense that was the spark that lit the flame inside my soul, illuminating my faith, was the sense of sight.  standing on the mount of olives, seeing in one direction the desert where He went to be tempted, and in the other direction the city of jerusalem below, where He looked down and was moved with compassion, i gathered a glimpse of the drive inside of Him, of loving a people so deeply that it grieved His spirit at their hopelessness.  sitting in the garden of gethsemane, and looking around at the olive trees, kneeling at the stone where He prayed, and closing my eyes and picturing the darkness of that night as He awaited arrest, knowing what lay ahead, and having a chance to walk away, but choosing to submit to the Father's will,  i experienced a mere semblance of the urgency of the mission that He must have felt, the urgency of knowing that there was no other way for sinful humans to meet God's demands for holiness.  walking the via dolorosa, "the way of anguish," i could almost hear the people shouting, could almost see them lining the streets, pressing upon Him and pushing Him forward towards the place of His crucifixion.  it flooded me with the great sorrow that weighed heavier upon Him than the cross he bore upon his back, a sorrow not of what He was going through, but a sorrow wrought in the ignorance of the people around Him, the ones He loved, who not only didn't love Him back, but hated and despised Him, of a love unrequited.  few things in this life are as painful as a broken heart, and His heart was breaking as He walked that half-mile to golgotha.  seeing the rough stones on that street, and the steps going upward, that made it a sometimes unstable and difficult walk, brought to life the unbelievable task of walking that street while dehydrated and exhausted from lack of sleep, with the immense weight of a wooden crossbeam on His back.  going into the church of the holy sepulchre, i climbed the steps to golgotha, and saw and touched the ground where He was nailed to the cross, and the hole that the cross was dropped down into.  i closed my eyes and tried to block out the gaudiness of the silver and gold icons that now surrounded the place where my Saviour died for me.  i imagined what the area looked like, the smells of death and decay that would have permeated the air.  i saw His passion as He cried out "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."  climbing down from golgotha, i went to the place where His body was prepared for burial.  the romans in their cruelty, wanted to make sure that people realized the penalty for defying them, so they would not only leave people on the crosses for days after their death, to be used as fodder for crows, but once the deceased condemned were taken down from the cross, there was a stone slab nearby that their body would be placed upon and sometimes left for days as well, so that their grotesqueness and decay would be witnessed by all who passed by.  this as well removed any shred of dignity as their body lay there naked awaiting their loved ones, if any dared, to come out and prepare them for burial, and would be a further reminder to the jews of what happened when someone dared to defy the roman empire.  it was there that i saw His humility, in allowing them to treat Him with such contempt, and it resounded in my mind, flooding my thoughts, the verse where it said, "and He humbled himself, being obedient to death, even to death on a cross."  it was there that the "even" garnered meaning beyond anything i ever have imagined in my head.

and then, as i stood in line for 20 minutes to spend my 15 seconds inside His tomb, a tide of reality crashed into my faith.  the King was dead.  you read it in the Bible, you see it in movies and plays, but here, in the coldness and solemnity of this dark, cold, stone church, the reality set in.  as i waited to enter, i realized what the disciples must have felt as they waited.  those 20 minutes seemed like hours, as i tried to process all my soul was experiencing through the rush of the dwindling of time, like trying to drink in as much of a river as you could as it rushed past.  before entering His tomb, there was a tomb in a room off to the right, that was the tomb that joseph of arimithea occupied after giving his tomb to CHRIST.  it was not covered with a chapel, nor was it garnished with gold and silver or icons and paintings, but rather was a simple room, left untouched save the walls and high ceiling of the church built around the site.  the floor was not paved, but was still a rock and dirt floor, and you could walk down into it and see and experience what an actual tomb was like during the time of CHRIST.  this was a reminder of the lack of pomp surrounding CHRIST's burial.  i pictured that as i made my way forward with the pilgrims of the faithful to the entrance of CHRIST's tomb.  it was now covered with the extravagance that the church had bestowed upon the holy place.  the entrance was low and cramped, and only 3 or 4 people could be inside at a time due to the space constraints.  as i entered, an overwhelming sense of holiness permeated the air.  some may say it was emotion, but it was more than that.  i felt a stirring in my soul that was as powerful as that day in el naranjal, when CHRIST revealed Himself to me.  there it was:  the stone where His body lay.  it is important to note that:  it was His body.  He was dead.  this was a tomb, a grave, cold and dark, sealed off by a massive stone, despite the spectacle that it has now become.  in those 15 seconds inside, before the attendant outside began rushing us out, i experienced a lifetime.  for a moment, time stood still.  and in the final seconds, as i knelt there with tears running down my face, i saw Him defeat death, and noted that His body is not there!  joseph of arimithea's bones were carried away and put in a church somewhere, as were the other apostles and saints throughout history.  but there were no bones of CHRIST to carry away.  i watched Him in my mind's eye, sit up on that slab, place His feet over the side, stand up, and walk out of that tomb.  He's alive!  and because He's alive, we now have all of these places that have been preserved.  because He's alive, i now have a Saviour, instead of a dead religious leader leaving me hopeless.  the King is alive!

there were those there that kissed the places mentioned.  there were those that were simply there because of the historical significance of them.  there were those there that signed up for a tour, and missed the Saviour.  that's because rocks and churches and paintings are just that:  creations.  there is little value in and of those things apart from faith.  some chose to place their faith in those things, worshiping the creation instead of the Creator.  for me, they were a doorway to a hidden part of my faith that i never realized was there until yesterday.  Jesus said, "blessed are those who haven't seen and yet believe."  so was my faith any less real before yesterday?  absolutely not, as is the same with yours.  the government of nigeria will pay for their people to visit jerusalem once in their lifetime.  the nation of israel will pay for a "birthright" trip for every jew throughout the world to come to the holy land once in their lifetime.  i wish that every one of you could get the chance to come and experience the holy land, if only once in your lifetime.  but for those who will never be able to, take heart, for your faith without sight is blessed, and one day, all of us will have our faith become sight when we stand before Him in Heaven to share eternity in His presence!  until that day, my faith will forever be changed, having seen a glimpse of the Saviour, much like moses in the cleft of the rock, and having those places in Scripture come to life, from words typed on the onion-skin paper of my Bible, to a place of strengthened reality in my soul.  there is no greater CHRISTmas present that i could ever have asked for!    

the night before CHRISTmas, navy style

*this post is not in my usual format since i cut and pasted it from my original file.  but this was a version of "the night before CHRISTmas" i wrote for my sailors on both uss stout and bainbridge.

Twas the night before Christmas, somewhere in the Med,
When “Taps, lights out” was heard, as passageways glowed red.
The night watch was busy standing their posts,
Diligently watching for any threat posed.
The Sailors were in berthings, exhausted from the day,
Dreaming of their families celebrating Christmas far away.

The bridge kept the helm, and I looked out aft,
As the stars above sparkled while the dark water churned past,
When out in the distance, I swore I heard bells,
What exactly it was, my eyes could not tell.
I called on the radio to report the strange sound,
But their radar showed nothing, no contacts to be found,
The full moon shone brightly, lighting up the sky,
As what I heard suddenly appeared to my eyes:
A sleigh pulled by reindeer, with Santa at the reins,
Which made me think the dark was playing tricks with my brain.
But the moonlight o’er the darkness, left absolutely no doubt,
That it really was Santa as he circled about.

Around the ship quickly, past the bridge he flew,
And I wondered if the bridge lookout saw him, too.
Yet no word was passed, from the radio, no sound,
As St. Nick and his reindeer came flying down.
Though flight quarters weren’t set, no flight crew in sight,
St. Nicholas and nine reindeer on the flight deck did light.

I stood there and stared, pinched my arm just to see,
If I had fallen asleep, and this all was a dream.
But as I pondered this unbelievable sight,
St. Nick stroked his beard, and put down his pipe.
He looked at me intently, and then gave a frown,
As he stood up and from his sleigh he climbed down.
“Young man,” he said to me, “I wonder if you might,
Explain to me why you’re on this ship Christmas Eve night?”

“Sir,” I replied, “I am a Sailor on post,
And our ship is deployed far away from our coast.”

His frown deepened further, as he looked at me and said,

“But this is Christmas Eve, you should be with family instead!”
The thought of my family brought a lump to my throat,
And I swallowed hard against tears as I zipped up my coat,

“Santa, I would much rather be home by my tree,
Watching my family unwrap presents, I miss them, you see,

But the nation, it counts upon Sailors like us,

To keep them all safe, and keep them safe we must.
Because there are those who would like to cause harm,
We’re here to stop them, so they’ve no need for alarm.
My shipmates and I, we all took an oath,
To support and defend, and with our best we’ll do both.”

His eyes welled with tears, as he wiped them away,
And he said, “Thank you, son.  I don’t know what else to say.

I really would like to tell the rest this as well,
And maybe leave gifts, and some treats, so do tell,
It is obvious you have no chimney, there’s none I can see,

Save those big smoke stacks, would those work for me?”

“Santa,” I replied, with a smile on my face, “Those go to turbines, and the engineers’ space,

And even if you could, there’s no fireplace inside,
So I think you’d be better off staying outside,”

He smiled and looked up, and then looked back at me,

And said, “Is there any kind of present they’d gladly receive?”

I closed my eyes and pictured Christmas back home,
As my family would be waiting for my call on the phone,

“Santa, I believe I can speak for the crew,

And I know exactly what they all would ask of you,

Go back and tell everyone that you see,
That our watch is our Christmas gift to them from the sea.”

He came to attention, and gave me a salute,
And said that he would do that, with love from the troops.
So he climbed back up, and sat in his sleigh,
And said those words heard that first Christmas Day.
“Peace on earth among all, I pray you will see,

And you no longer will have to spend Christmas at sea.
But until that day comes, please know that you,

Share mine and a nation’s utmost gratitude.”
He gave the reins a snap, and they took off like a light,
Just like a helo, lifting off in flight. 

And as I heard the 1MC call the lookout team away,

I heard him shout, “Merry Christmas to you all, and Anchors Aweigh!”

grave rolling st. nicholas

on the ship, i have been videoing readings of "the night before CHRISTmas," where people can read the book and i can burn it onto a dvd for them to send to their families.  it is truly one of my favorite CHRISTmas traditions.  the point of this post is not to get into the whole debate about "to santa, or not to santa," but rather to point out something that i noticed during the many times of hearing this story read.  are you ready?  here is a direct quote from the book, "he spoke not a word, but went straight to his work and filled all the stockings, then turned with a jerk, and laying a finger aside of his nose and giving a nod, up the chimney he rose."  did you see it?  i ask because after all the times i have read this poem, i never saw it until recently.  what did st. nicholas do?  or better yet, what didn't he do?  read it again.  "went straight to his work and filled all the stockings."  did you catch it?  that was all he did!  it didn't say he filled the room with presents, or decorated the CHRISTmas tree, or checked his list to make sure little johnny and susie got every gift that was on their list.  nope.  just filled some stockings.  nothing more, nothing less. 

i say this, because you have all heard me rant and rave about the materialistic idol worship service that CHRISTmas has become.  i hear pastors all the time preaching from the pulpit vilifying st. nicholas, or as he is commonly known in the common vernacular:  "santa claus" (coming from the dutch variation of st. nicholas sinterclaas.)  however, st. nicholas, or santa claus, is not the villain.  if you look at the historical account of st. nicholas, he lived in the late 200s and early 300s a.d.   he was the son of a wealthy couple who died, and left him a huge inheritance.  he was a very devout CHRISTian, and would use his wealth to help others, even after becoming a bishop in what is now modern day turkey.  the most famous story attributed to saint nicholas was the leaving of three bags of gold coins at the house of a poor man.  this money was to meant to be the dowry for his three young daughters, so that he could afford to have them married and them not be relegated to a life of prostitution.  the tradition was that he threw the bags through the window of the house for three consecutive nights, because he wanted the gift to remain anonymous so as to not embarrass the man.  on the third night, the man stood outside his house to try and find out the identity of the mysterious benefactor, so nicholas dropped the bag of coins down the chimney, which happened to land in one of the girls' stockings, which were hung by the fireplace to dry after washing them.  other accounts have him leaving coins or fruit in the shoes of children that were left outside the door to avoid tracking dirt from outside into the house.  this was traditionally held to have happened on december 6th, which is why much of the world celebrates st. nicholas day on decemeber 6th.  it wasn't until the poem, "a visit from st. nick," was published in 1822 in a newspaper in troy, ny, that they modern day figure of st. nicholas came into being.  the author, clement moore, who wished to remain anonymous at the time, wrote it as a fictional story to his children based upon the story of st. nicholas.  he himself was a clergyman and used historical facts to write the poem, such as st. nicholas having a white beard and dressing in red, as he was commonly shown in the orthodox icons.  he took some liberties in changing the date to coincide with CHRISTmas, but until then, st. nicholas was not associated with the holiday. 

so why the history lesson?  because i believe that if st. nicholas could see what his story has morphed into today, he would roll over in his grave.  this was a man who devoted his life to helping others, including sailors, which is why he is the patron saint of mariners.  he was a person who was not materialistic, but rather one who sought to help others with the gifts that God had given him.  that is a far cry from what santa claus and CHRISTmas represents in today's society.  but there is a debate technique called "setting up a straw man," in which a person sets up a decoy and attacks it, rather than attacking the actual problem.  this is the whole debate over santa claus.  you see, many people attack the "lie" of santa claus, and not what the lie represents.  many of the people who preach against santa claus have no problem with other make-believe games with their children.  how many dads have had sword-fights with their kids only to fall to their young knights' blows?  was the dad dead?  no!  he was pretending.  how many moms have sat at a tea party with their daughters and sipped pretend tea, telling them how good it was?  i know many santa claus deniers that have admitted to playing the tooth fairy game.  what is creepier?  a little fairy that loves children's teeth so much that they are willing to pay for them, or a man who gives gifts to children out of generosity?  but, like i said before, the purpose of this post is not to debate the game of santa claus.  because the game is not the problem.  yet we sit and whack away at the straw man that is santa claus, all the while ignoring the real problem:  greed and coveting.  why do we do this?  because it's easier to attack a fictional character as the culprit behind the problem that we create ourselves.  we are the culprits of greed. 

in the movie "fred claus," the statement is made that in the early 1900s, the average child asked for 3 presents, and today that list has grown to 27 gifts per child, and due to this increase, there was no way that santa claus could keep up with the demand and needed to step aside.  it's comical, but true.  there was a letter from the early 1900s to santa claus that was recently published, and the list was surprisingly simple and short.  the modern day phenomenon that is black friday, that everyone laments, was created by us.  it's easy to blame the merchants.  but yet, the real blame lies on us.  think about it, if the CHRISTmas lists of the early 1900s hadn't grown into the books that they have become, those children wouldn't have grown up expecting extravagant CHRISTmases, nor would they have passed that on to their children.  we are all born with the sin nature, meaning that we are all born wanting stuff.  and when that nature is fed, it grows.  that's why the Bible says to train up a child in the way he should go.  so when our kids begin becoming materialistic, we can either a) teach them the dangers of greed and want, or b) feed their greed and want and watch it grow to the point that we stab other parents trying to take the last ps4 at wal-mart on black friday because we have to get it for our kids or they won't have a good CHRISTmas.  so the problem is not an imaginary obese man in a red suit, it is the greed that has been unfairly associated with a man who devoted his life to giving to help others.

so what are we to do?  can we fight society?  no.  we can't stop the ebb and flow of the societal river.  but we can take a stand in our own lives and the lives of our children.  there is nothing wrong with giving gifts.  the gifts given to the CHRIST-child are a perfect example of this.  but when it comes to CHRISTmas and the traditions surrounding it, we can take that opportunity to teach our kids about contentment.  just because a kid gives you a list doesn't mean that you have to get them everything on it.  it doesn't mean that you have to go into debt to buy gifts that you can't afford.  it means that you take the time to teach your kids about what it means to be greedy, and the dangers of that mentality.  it means that you love your kids enough to tell them "no" to outrageous requests.  it means that you share in the magic of CHRISTmas with your children, by reading them fictional stories and decorating and engaging in family activities together such as making cookies and candies.  or better yet, how about our taking the story of st. nicholas, and teaching that to our kids, about giving to others less fortunate, whether that's packing a box for operation: CHRISTmas child, or buying a CHRISTmas meal for the family in your church that is struggling, or by pulling an angel off the angel tree at the mall and giving your kids the opportunity to share their CHRISTmas with an unknown child that is truly in need.  psychologists have even shown that a person who gives is happier than a person who gets.  in "a CHRISTmas carol," the ghost of CHRISTmas present shows ebeneezer scrooge the two children hidden underneath the bottom of his robe.  he says that their names are "ignorance and want," but to beware "ignorance" most, because on his forehead is written the word "doom."  our "want" has consumed us, but our "ignorance" of it will lead us to our doom.  a nation that is greedy will eventually consume itself.  judging by what we see every year in december, it doesn't seem we are far from it.